Diagnostic chest X-rays and breast cancer risk among women with a hereditary predisposition to breast cancer unexplained by a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation

Nom de la revue
Breast Cancer Research
Maximiliano Ribeiro Guerra, Juliette Coignard, Séverine Eon-Marchais, Marie-Gabrielle Dondon, Dorothée Le Gal, Juana Beauvallet, Noura Mebirouk, Muriel Belotti, Olivier Caron, Marion Gauthier-Villars, Isabelle Coupier, Bruno Buecher, Alain Lortholary, Jean-Pierre Fricker, Paul Gesta, Catherine Noguès, Laurence Faivre, Pascaline Berthet, Elisabeth Luporsi, Capucine Delnatte, Valérie Bonadona, Christine M. Maugard, Pascal Pujol, Christine Lasset, Michel Longy, Yves-Jean Bignon, Claude Adenis-Lavignasse, Laurence Venat-Bouvet, Hélène Dreyfus, Laurence Gladieff, Isabelle Mortemousque, Séverine Audebert-Bellanger, Florent Soubrier, Sophie Giraud, Sophie Lejeune-Dumoulin, Jean-Marc Limacher, Jean Chiesa, Anne Fajac, Anne Floquet, François Eisinger, Julie Tinat, Sandra Fert-Ferrer, Chrystelle Colas, Thierry Frebourg, Francesca Damiola, Laure Barjhoux, Eve Cavaciuti, Sylvie Mazoyer, Anne Tardivon, Fabienne Lesueur, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Nadine Andrieu
Abstract

Abstract
Background
Diagnostic ionizing radiation is a risk factor for breast cancer (BC). BC risk increases with increased dose to the chest and decreases with increased age at exposure, with possible effect modification related to familial or genetic predisposition. While chest X-rays increase the BC risk of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers compared to non-carriers, little is known for women with a hereditary predisposition to BC but who tested negative for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation.

Methods
We evaluated the effect of chest X-rays from diagnostic medical procedures in a dataset composed of 1552 BC cases identified through French family cancer clinics and 1363 unrelated controls. Participants reported their history of X-ray exposures in a detailed questionnaire and were tested for 113 DNA repair genes. Logistic regression and multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess the association with BC.

Results
Chest X-ray exposure doubled BC risk. A 3% increased BC risk per additional exposure was observed. Being 20 years old or younger at first exposure or being exposed before first full-term pregnancy did not seem to modify this risk. Birth after 1960 or carrying a rare likely deleterious coding variant in a DNA repair gene other than BRCA1/2 modified the effect of chest X-ray exposure.

Conclusion
Ever/never chest X-ray exposure increases BC risk 2-fold regardless of age at first exposure and, by up to 5-fold when carrying 3 or more rare variants in a DNA repair gene.
Further studies are needed to evaluate other DNA repair genes or variants to identify those which could modify radiation sensitivity. Identification of subpopulations that are more or less susceptible to ionizing radiation is important and potentially clinically relevant.